The impact of operative timing on outcomes of appendicitis: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Project analysis
Abstract Background Surgery is indicated for acute uncomplicated appendicitis but the optimal timing is controversial. Recent literature is conflicting on the effect of time to intervention. Methods We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project dataset for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2015-03, Vol.209 (3), p.498-502 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background Surgery is indicated for acute uncomplicated appendicitis but the optimal timing is controversial. Recent literature is conflicting on the effect of time to intervention. Methods We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project dataset for patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy between 2007 and 2012. Logistic regression was used to evaluate 30-day morbidity and mortality of intervention at different time periods, adjusting for preoperative risk factors. Results A total of 69,926 patients undergoing appendectomy were identified. Groups were divided by time to intervention: group 1, less than 24 hours (n = 55,839; 79.9%); group 2, 24 to 48 hours (n = 13,409; 18.6%); and group 3, greater than 48 hours (n = 1,038; 1.5%). After adjustment, the risk of complication remained increased for group 3 versus group 1 or 2 (odds ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.34 to 2.07). Conclusions These data demonstrate equivalent outcomes between time to appendectomy of less than 24 and 24 to 48 hours. There was a 2-fold increase in complication rate for patients delayed longer than 48 hours. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.013 |