Vote Recall: A Panel Study on the Mechanisms That Explain Vote Recall Inconsistency

Voters' recall of past behavior is known to be inaccurate. Yet, owing to data limitations, the precise mechanisms behind recall inconsistency have not yet been pulled apart empirically. We analyze the Dutch 1VOP panel data set (29,955 respondents, 53 waves) to simultaneously test four explanati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of public opinion research 2014-03, Vol.26 (1), p.18-40
Hauptverfasser: van Elsas, Erika J, Lubbe, Rozemarijn, van der Meer, Tom WG, van der Brug, Wouter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Voters' recall of past behavior is known to be inaccurate. Yet, owing to data limitations, the precise mechanisms behind recall inconsistency have not yet been pulled apart empirically. We analyze the Dutch 1VOP panel data set (29,955 respondents, 53 waves) to simultaneously test four explanations of recall inconsistency. We conclude that vote recall is explained by forgetfulness, nonattitudes, and cognitive bias, but find no evidence for measurement bias. Recall consistency is affected by current party preference and by volatility in party preferences. Both effects become stronger with longer time intervals between recalls. We discuss the implications for (cross-national) survey research methodology and for substantive research on electoral volatility and offer tentative solutions against the resulting validity, reliability, and equivalence issues. Adapted from the source document.
ISSN:0954-2892
1471-6909
DOI:10.1093/ijpor/edt031