Preliminary Radiographic Outcomes of Surgical Correction in Juvenile Hallux Valgus: Single Proximal, Single Distal Versus Double Osteotomies

BACKGROUND:Surgical correction of juvenile hallux valgus has a high risk of recurrence and complications. This short-term follow-up study evaluates the radiographic differences between 3 osteotomy typesdistal first metatarsal osteotomy, proximal first metatarsal osteotomy, and double first metatarsa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric orthopaedics 2015-04, Vol.35 (3), p.307-313
Hauptverfasser: Edmonds, Eric W, Ek, Dorsey, Bomar, James D, Joffe, Avrum, Mubarak, Scott J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND:Surgical correction of juvenile hallux valgus has a high risk of recurrence and complications. This short-term follow-up study evaluates the radiographic differences between 3 osteotomy typesdistal first metatarsal osteotomy, proximal first metatarsal osteotomy, and double first metatarsal osteotomy with regard to ability to achieve correction and the risk of hallux varus. METHODS:A total of 106 feet were evaluated. Percent correction of hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) was recorded, as well as complication and reoperation rates. Radiographs were evaluated at the initial visit, intraoperatively, and at final follow-up. RESULTS:The single distal osteotomy achievedIMA within normal limits 21% of the time with no cases of overcorrection; HVA within normal limits 42% of the time with 13% overcorrected; and DMAA within normal limits 46% of the time with 4% overcorrected.The single proximal osteotomy achievedIMA within normal limits 36% of the time with no cases of overcorrection; HVA within normal limits 36% of the time with no cases of overcorrection; and DMAA within normal limits 36% of the time with 7% overcorrected.The double osteotomy achievedIMA within normal limits 54% of the time with no cases of overcorrection; HVA within normal limits 40% of the time with 7% overcorrected; and DMAA within normal limits 56% of the time with 22% overcorrected.The rate of HVA overcorrection was not found to be correlated with osteotomy type (P=0.37). The double osteotomy was found to have a higher DMAA overcorrection rate than either single osteotomy (P
ISSN:0271-6798
1539-2570
DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000257