Assessment of Lipophilic vs. Hydrophilic Statin Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: ALPS-AMI Study

Background:Statins reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events, but no randomized trial has investigated the best statins for secondary prevention. We compared the efficacy of hydrophilic pravastatin with that of lipophilic atorvastatin in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation Journal 2014/12/25, Vol.79(1), pp.161-168
Hauptverfasser: Izawa, Atsushi, Kashima, Yuichiro, Miura, Takashi, Ebisawa, Soichiro, Kitabayashi, Hiroshi, Yamamoto, Hiroaki, Sakurai, Shunpei, Kagoshima, Mitsuru, Tomita, Takeshi, Miyashita, Yusuke, Koyama, Jun, Ikeda, Uichi, on behalf of the ALPS-AMI Investigators
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background:Statins reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events, but no randomized trial has investigated the best statins for secondary prevention. We compared the efficacy of hydrophilic pravastatin with that of lipophilic atorvastatin in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods and Results:A prospective, multicenter study enrolled 508 patients (410 men; mean age, 66.0±11.6 years) with AMI who were randomly assigned to atorvastatin (n=255) or pravastatin (n=253). The target control level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was
ISSN:1346-9843
1347-4820
DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0877