A Pilot Walking Program Promotes Moderate-Intensity Physical Activity during Pregnancy

INTRODUCTIONWalking may be a strategy for increasing moderate-intensity physical activity (MPA) during pregnancy. PURPOSEThis study aimed to promote MPA among overweight and obese pregnant women, via walking, and to evaluate the effect of the intervention on maternal and birth outcomes. METHODSThirt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2014-03, Vol.46 (3), p.462-471
Hauptverfasser: KONG, KAI LING, CAMPBELL, CHRISTINA G, FOSTER, RANDAL C, PETERSON, ANNA D, LANNINGHAM-FOSTER, LORRAINE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:INTRODUCTIONWalking may be a strategy for increasing moderate-intensity physical activity (MPA) during pregnancy. PURPOSEThis study aimed to promote MPA among overweight and obese pregnant women, via walking, and to evaluate the effect of the intervention on maternal and birth outcomes. METHODSThirty-seven overweight or obese pregnant women were randomly assigned to a walking intervention or control group. Anthropometric and objective PA (StepWatch™ Activity Monitor) data were collected for four 1-wk periodsweeks 10–14 (V1), weeks 17–19 (V2), weeks 27–29 (V3), and weeks 34–36 (V4) of gestation. Participants provided information about maternal and birth outcomes. A cadence of ≥80 steps per minute was defined as MPA, and “meaningful walking” was defined as moderate walking in ≥8-min bouts. ANOVA was used to determine the differences in walking amount and meaningful walks, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used for walking intensity distribution analysis, and Fisher’s exact test was used for maternal and infant outcomes analyses. Pearson correlation was used to examine the association between prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain (GWG). RESULTSThere was significantly more MPA among women in the intervention group compared with those in the control group at V2 (overweight, P < 0.0001; obese, P < 0.025), V3 (overweight, P < 0.0001), and V4 (overweight, P < 0.0001; obese, P < 0.025). Women in the intervention group significantly increased their meaningful walks at V2 (P = 0.054), V3 (P = 0.01), and V4 (P = 0.014). There were trends for intervention group women to have more favorable maternal and birth outcomes compared with the control group. Rates of GWG at measurement points during pregnancy were significantly associated with preceding rates of GWG. CONCLUSIONThe pilot, unsupervised walking intervention increased the MPA of overweight and obese women during pregnancy.
ISSN:0195-9131
1530-0315
DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000141