Major hepatectomy in Bismuth types I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract Background Historically, hilar bile duct resection (HBDR) has been regarded as the choice of treatment for Bismuth types I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). The present study aimed to evaluate the advantages of major liver resection (MLR) in the treatment of patients with Bismuth type...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2015-03, Vol.194 (1), p.194-201
Hauptverfasser: Xiong, Junjie, MD, Nunes, Quentin M., MD, Huang, Wei, MD, Wei, Ailin, MD, Ke, Nengwen, MD, Mai, Gang, MD, PhD, Liu, Xubao, MD, PhD, Hu, Weiming, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Historically, hilar bile duct resection (HBDR) has been regarded as the choice of treatment for Bismuth types I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). The present study aimed to evaluate the advantages of major liver resection (MLR) in the treatment of patients with Bismuth types I and II HCCA when compared with HBDR. Materials and methods Between January 2005 and September 2012, in total, 52 patients with Bismuth types I and II HCCA who underwent HBDR alone or MLR were included for retrospective analysis. The intraoperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and oncological outcomes including recurrence and overall or disease-free survival rate were compared. Results The MLR group had significantly higher curative resection rates compared with the HBDR group (95% versus 62.5%, P  = 0.021) and lower tumor recurrence (28% versus 63%, P  = 0.049), albeit with longer operating time (395.5 ± 112.7 versus 270.9 ± 98.8, P  
ISSN:0022-4804
1095-8673
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.029