Immobilised whole-cell recombinant monoamine oxidase biocatalysis

This work demonstrates the first example of the immobilisation of MAO-N whole cells to produce a biocatalyst that remained suitable for repetitive use after 11 months of storage and stable up to 15 months after immobilisation. The production of Escherichia coli expressing recombinant MAO-N was scale...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2015-02, Vol.99 (3), p.1229-1236
Hauptverfasser: Zajkoska, Petra, Rosenberg, Michal, Heath, Rachel, Malone, Kirk J, Stloukal, Radek, Turner, Nicholas J, Rebroš, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This work demonstrates the first example of the immobilisation of MAO-N whole cells to produce a biocatalyst that remained suitable for repetitive use after 11 months of storage and stable up to 15 months after immobilisation. The production of Escherichia coli expressing recombinant MAO-N was scaled up to bioreactors under regulated, previously optimised conditions (10 % DO, pH 7), and the amount of biomass was almost doubled compared to flask cultivation. Subsequently, pilot immobilisation of the whole-cell biocatalyst using LentiKats® technology was performed. The amount of the immobilised biomass was optimised and the process was scaled up to a production level by immobilising 15 g of dry cell weight per litre of polyvinyl alcohol to produce 3 kg of whole-cell ready-to-use biocatalyst. The immobilised biocatalyst retained its initial activity over six consecutive biotransformations of the secondary amine model compound 3-azabicylo [3,3,0]octane, a building block of the hepatitis C drug telaprevir. Consecutive cultivation cycles in growth conditions not only increased the initial specific activity of biocatalyst produced on the industrial plant by more than 30 %, but also significantly increased the rate of the biotransformation compared to the non-propagated biocatalyst.
ISSN:0175-7598
1432-0614
DOI:10.1007/s00253-014-5983-1