How Reliable Are Lower-Limb Kinematics and Kinetics during a Drop Vertical Jump?

PURPOSEAs drop vertical jumps (DVJ) are widely used as a screening task, the assessment of the reliability of lower-limb biomechanical parameters during DVJ is important. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the kinematic and kinetic peak values as well as of the waveforms for lowe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2014-04, Vol.46 (4), p.678-685
Hauptverfasser: Malfait, Bart, Sankey, Sean, Firhad Raja Azidin, Raja M, Deschamps, Kevin, Vanrenterghem, Jos, Robinson, Mark A, Staes, Filip, Verschueren, Sabine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSEAs drop vertical jumps (DVJ) are widely used as a screening task, the assessment of the reliability of lower-limb biomechanical parameters during DVJ is important. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the kinematic and kinetic peak values as well as of the waveforms for lower-limb parameters obtained with the Liverpool John Moores University biomechanical model (LJMU model) during performance of DVJ. METHODSThe reliability was analyzed by calculating the intertrial (o), intersession (o), and intertherapist (o) errors of hip and knee joint parameters in a repeated-measures design including two therapists and a total of six sessions. RESULTSThe results showed o that ranged from 1.1° to 3.5° for all peak kinematic parameters and from 3.6 to 12.9 N·m for all peak kinetic parameters. The o of the peak values ranged from1.9° to 5.7° for all angles and from 5.4 to 19.8 N·m for the hip and knee joint moments in all planes. The o of the peak values ranged from 2.7° to 6.4° for all angles and from 5.8 to 22.4 N·m for all moments. Most of the kinematic and kinetic peak parameters had o ≤ 2.0° and 4.3 N·m, respectively, suggesting a small extrinsic variability. Furthermore, the entire waveforms also showed a rather high o relative to other types of variability. CONCLUSIONSThe present findings indicated that DVJ kinetics and kinematics show small extrinsic variability. The reported errors are useful for clinical interpretation processes of DVJ performance as screening task for injury risk and rehabilitation outcome taking into consideration the different types of measurement error over time.
ISSN:0195-9131
1530-0315
DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000170