Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

Purpose To identify any MRI predictors for surgical outcomes of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) having instrumented posterior decompression (IPD) surgery. Materials and methods Seventy patients with DLSS who underwent IPD were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical score of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese journal of radiology 2012-12, Vol.30 (10), p.811-818
Hauptverfasser: Alicioglu, Banu, Yilmaz, Baris, Bulakbasi, Nail, Copuroglu, Cem, Yalniz, Erol, Aykac, Bilal, Urut, Devrim Ulas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To identify any MRI predictors for surgical outcomes of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) having instrumented posterior decompression (IPD) surgery. Materials and methods Seventy patients with DLSS who underwent IPD were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical score of each patient was assessed using the JOAS (Japanese Orthopedics Association Scoring) system, which is mainly based on the subjective symptoms and physical signs of the patients before (JOAS-I) and after (JOAS-II) surgery. Healing rate (HR) was calculated as: [(JOAS-II) − (JOAS-I)] × 100/[15 − (JOAS-I)]. HR >50 % was considered clinical improvement. Radiological stenosis was assessed on MRI and was graded from 0 to 3 at the laminectomy level in terms of thecal sac-nerve root compression, foraminal stenosis, and facet degeneration. Results Mean HR of the improved patients ( n  = 39) was 81.94; HR of the unimproved patients ( n  = 31) was 34.75 ( p   0.05). HR was worse in patients with severe facet degeneration. Conclusions Surgical outcomes of DLSS depend on multiple variables. It is not possible to predict the outcomes by assessing only one parameter. The possible outcomes should be analyzed by considering all the factors individually.
ISSN:1867-1071
1867-108X
DOI:10.1007/s11604-012-0125-0