Is the rearfoot pattern the most frequently foot strike pattern among recreational shod distance runners?

Abstract Objective To determine the distribution of the foot strike patterns among recreational shod runners and to compare the personal and training characteristics between runners with different foot strike patterns. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Areas of running practice in São Paulo, Bra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical therapy in sport 2015-02, Vol.16 (1), p.29-33
Hauptverfasser: de Almeida, Matheus Oliveira, Saragiotto, Bruno Tirotti, Yamato, Tiê Parma, Lopes, Alexandre Dias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective To determine the distribution of the foot strike patterns among recreational shod runners and to compare the personal and training characteristics between runners with different foot strike patterns. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Areas of running practice in São Paulo, Brazil. Participants 514 recreational shod runners older than 18 years and free of injury. Outcomes measures Foot strike patterns were evaluated with a high-speed camera (250 Hz) and photocells to assess the running speed of participants. Personal and training characteristics were collected through a questionnaire. Results The inter-rater reliability of the visual foot strike pattern classification method was 96.7% and intra-rater reliability was 98.9%. 95.1% ( n  = 489) of the participants were rearfoot strikers, 4.1% ( n  = 21) were midfoot strikers, and four runners (0.8%) were forefoot strikers. There were no significant differences between strike patterns for personal and training characteristics. Conclusion This is the first study to demonstrate that almost all recreational shod runners were rearfoot strikers. The visual method of evaluation seems to be a reliable and feasible option to classify foot strike pattern.
ISSN:1466-853X
1873-1600
DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.02.005