Sit down and read on: Working memory and long-term memory in particle-verb processing

•Working-memory demands and lexical access in particle-verb processing were examined.•Sentences containing discontinuous verb–particle combinations were presented.•Verbs that license particles elicited a LAN relative to verbs that do not.•Implausible particles elicited a larger N400 relative to plau...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain and language 2013-11, Vol.127 (2), p.296-306
Hauptverfasser: Piai, Vitória, Meyer, Lars, Schreuder, Robert, Bastiaansen, Marcel C.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Working-memory demands and lexical access in particle-verb processing were examined.•Sentences containing discontinuous verb–particle combinations were presented.•Verbs that license particles elicited a LAN relative to verbs that do not.•Implausible particles elicited a larger N400 relative to plausible ones.•Particle-verb processing involves working-memory storage and dual lexical access. Particle verbs (e.g., look up) are lexical items for which particle and verb share a single lexical entry. Using event-related brain potentials, we examined working memory and long-term memory involvement in particle-verb processing. Dutch participants read sentences with head verbs that allow zero, two, or more than five particles to occur downstream. Additionally, sentences were presented for which the encountered particle was semantically plausible, semantically implausible, or forming a non-existing particle verb. An anterior negativity was observed at the verbs that potentially allow for a particle downstream relative to verbs that do not, possibly indexing storage of the verb until the dependency with its particle can be closed. Moreover, a graded N400 was found at the particle (smallest amplitude for plausible particles and largest for particles forming non-existing particle verbs), suggesting that lexical access to a shared lexical entry occurred at two separate time points.
ISSN:0093-934X
1090-2155
DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.09.015