What is the best therapeutic approach to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia?

PURPOSE OF REVIEWThe purpose of this review is to define what the best therapeutic approach is for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia. RECENT FINDINGSAlthough two meta-analyses reported conflicting findings, recent retrospective studies reported higher succ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current opinion in infectious diseases 2015-04, Vol.28 (2), p.164-170
Hauptverfasser: Peyrani, Paula, Ramirez, Julio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSE OF REVIEWThe purpose of this review is to define what the best therapeutic approach is for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia. RECENT FINDINGSAlthough two meta-analyses reported conflicting findings, recent retrospective studies reported higher success rates in patients with MRSA pneumonia treated with linezolid when compared to vancomycin. Only registration trials are available for some anti-MRSA antibiotics, such as telavancin, ceftaroline, and ceftobiprole. Scarce information is available regarding the best therapeutic approach for MRSA community-acquired pneumonia. SUMMARYLinezolid seems to be a better choice than vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA ventilator-associated pneumonia. It is still unclear whether this affirmation holds for other forms of MRSA pneumonia. Further research is needed to define whether newer antibiotics are better alternatives than currently recommended agents.
ISSN:0951-7375
1473-6527
DOI:10.1097/QCO.0000000000000149