Similar outcome after transplantation of moderate macrovesicular steatotic and nonsteatotic livers when the cold ischemia time is kept very short

Summary Background Livers with moderate (30–60%) macrovesicular steatosis have been associated with poor outcome after transplantation. Aim of this study was to examine the outcome after transplantation of livers with moderate macrovesicular steatosis when the cold ischemia time (CIT) is kept very short. Methods Postoperative outcome of 19 recipients of a moderate steatotic liver were compared with a matched control group of 95 recipients of a nonsteatotic liver graft (1:5 ratio). We studied graft/patient survival rates, incidences of primary nonfunction, postoperative complications (classified according to the Clavien–Dindo classification), first‐week postoperative hepatic injury serum markers (AST/ALT), and liver function tests (PT time/bilirubin/lactate). In addition, we studied reversal of graft steatosis in follow‐up biopsies. Results Median CIT in livers with moderate steatosis and in controls was below 8 h in both groups. Although short‐ and long‐term patient/graft survival rates and results of liver function tests were similar, serum markers of hepatic injury and postoperative complications (especially grade IVa) were significantly higher in recipients of a moderate steatotic liver. Reversal of steatosis was seen in 9 of the 11 (82%) recipients with follow‐up liver biopsies. Conclusion Despite the association with severe postoperative complications, moderate macrovesicular steatotic livers can be used successfully for transplantation if the CIT is kept very short.