Toxigenic fungi in a water-damaged building: An intervention study

In an investigation of health complaints among employees of a water‐damaged office building, the environment showed evidence of fungal contamination with the isolation of Stachybotrys chartarum in one of five bulk samples tested for fungal growth. In response, a public health official recommended th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of industrial medicine 1998-08, Vol.34 (2), p.183-190
1. Verfasser: SUDAKIN, D. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In an investigation of health complaints among employees of a water‐damaged office building, the environment showed evidence of fungal contamination with the isolation of Stachybotrys chartarum in one of five bulk samples tested for fungal growth. In response, a public health official recommended that employees be relocated from the building. Employees were subsequently moved to a different environment. A focused environmental investigation of microbial growth within the building followed, revealing moderate to high levels of fungi (Penicillium, Aspergillus versicolor) and bacteria in bulk and surface samples. S. chartarum was identified in one of 19 (5%) environmental samples using Czapek agar. A health survey of building occupants revealed a high prevalence of multiple symptoms, with a predominance of neurobehavioral and upper respiratory tract complaints. The majority of symptoms were significantly less prevalent after relocation from the water‐damaged environment. The initial hypothesis that exposure to toxigenic fungi was responsible for the high prevalence of reported symptoms is difficult to investigate and confirm given the current limits of epidemiological knowledge regarding exposure to these organisms and building‐related illness. Future interventions where mycotoxin exposure is suspected should emphasize the importance of risk assessment and risk communication. Am. J. Ind. Med. 34:183–190, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0271-3586
1097-0274
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199808)34:2<183::AID-AJIM12>3.0.CO;2-R