Virus transport and removal in wastewater during aquifer recharge

To assess soil-aquifer treatment of sewage effluent for removal of viruses, studies were conducted at a recharge/recovery site near Tucson, Ariz. Two 13 m 2 basins were constructed in coarse sand alluvium, one for secondary- and one for tertiary-treated effluent. Bacterial viruses, MS2 and PRDI, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 1993, Vol.27 (4), p.583-590
Hauptverfasser: Powelson, David K., Gerba, Charles P., Yahya, Moyasar T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess soil-aquifer treatment of sewage effluent for removal of viruses, studies were conducted at a recharge/recovery site near Tucson, Ariz. Two 13 m 2 basins were constructed in coarse sand alluvium, one for secondary- and one for tertiary-treated effluent. Bacterial viruses, MS2 and PRDI, and a chemical tracer, potassium bromide (KBr), were added to effluent applied to these basins. Infiltration rates ranged from 0.2 to 16.8 m/d. Samples of unsaturated flow from depths of 0.30–6.08 m below the basin were taken through porous stainless steel suction-samplers. Bromide and virus results indicated the presence of preferential flow conditions that produced irregular concentration profiles with depth. Virus transport was retarded ( R = 1.9) at the beginning of a flooding cycle, but viruses were transported faster than the average water velocity ( R = 0.47) when applied after the infiltration rate had declined following 4 days of flooding. Virus specific removal rates ( b) during percolation through soil were 2.3–120 times greater than in bottles of effluent or ground water. PRDI was removed more rapidly during percolation ( b = 0.65 h −1) than MS2 ( b = 0.23 h −1). Effluent type did not significantly affect b for MS2, but the PRDI rate was nearly 3 times greater with secondary effluent (1.0 h −1) compared to tertiary effluent (0.35 h −1). Virus removals at the 4.3 m depth ranged from 37 to 99.7%.
ISSN:0043-1354
1879-2448
DOI:10.1016/0043-1354(93)90167-G