Improving interprofessional collaboration: Evaluation of implicit attitudes in the surgeon–nurse relationship
Abstract Background : Optimizing the surgeon–nurse relationship to improve interprofessional communication is increasingly recognized as an essential component of patient care. The increasing number of women surgeons has altered the surgeon-nurse dynamic, which has traditionally been a male–female r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of surgery (London, England) England), 2015-01, Vol.13, p.175-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background : Optimizing the surgeon–nurse relationship to improve interprofessional communication is increasingly recognized as an essential component of patient care. The increasing number of women surgeons has altered the surgeon-nurse dynamic, which has traditionally been a male–female relationship. In particular, this shift has raised the issue of whether implicit perceptions regarding gender and demeanor influence the interactions between surgeons and nurses. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to understand nurses' implicit perceptions of surgeons, with a particular focus on gender and gender-normative demeanor. We defined two types of demeanor: communal, which is classically associated with women and includes being supportive and nurturing, and agentic, which is a male-associated trait that includes being direct and assertive. Methods : We administered surveys to 1701 nurses at the main campus of our institution. Each survey had one of eight possible scenarios; all began with a short description of a surgeon who was described as accomplished and well-trained, then varied by surgeon gender (male/female), surgeon demeanor (agentic/communal) and type of surgery (breast cancer/lung cancer). Using a 0 to 5 scale, respondents rated their perception of the surgeon through five questions. These five items were averaged to create a composite perception score scaled from 0 to 5. Results : We received 493 surveys. The overall average perception score was 3.8 ± 0.99. Respondents had a statistically significant preference for the communal surgeon (4.1 ± 0.91) versus the agentic surgeon (3.6 ± 1.0, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1743-9191 1743-9159 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.032 |