Role of catalyst in hydrocracking of residues from Alberta bitumens

Vacuum residues (424 degree C+) from Cold Lake and Lloydminster bitumens were hydrocracked at 430 degree C, 13.9 MPa, over five materials: fresh and spent commercial Ni/Mo on gamma -alumina, Mo supported on gamma -alumina, a commercial demetallization catalyst, and gamma -alumina. Athabasca residue...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy & fuels 1992-07, Vol.6 (4), p.478-485
Hauptverfasser: Gray, Murray R, Khorasheh, Farhad, Wanke, Sieghard E, Achia, Umesh, Krzywicki, Andrzej, Sanford, Emerson C, Sy, Oscar K. Y, Ternan, Marten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Vacuum residues (424 degree C+) from Cold Lake and Lloydminster bitumens were hydrocracked at 430 degree C, 13.9 MPa, over five materials: fresh and spent commercial Ni/Mo on gamma -alumina, Mo supported on gamma -alumina, a commercial demetallization catalyst, and gamma -alumina. Athabasca residue was tested using fresh and spent Ni/Mo on gamma -alumina catalyst and was coked at atmospheric pressure in a batch apparatus. The product distributions from thermal (i.e., gamma -Al sub(3)O sub(3) or coker) experiments were similar to those from catalytic experiments; therefore, the catalysts served mainly to promote hydrogen transfer to the oil and hydrogenation of aromatic compounds. The activity of the catalysts for residue conversion, heteroatom removal, and hydrogenation of Cold Lake and Lloydminster residue was Ni/Mo on gamma -alumina > Mo on gamma -alumina > demetallization >> gamma -alumina. The sulfur in the naphtha and middle distillate fractions was most affected by the hydrogenation activity of the catalysts, based on a comparison to the products from thermal reactions only. The largest effect of the catalyst on conversion of aromatics was in the middle distillate fractions.
ISSN:0887-0624
1520-5029
DOI:10.1021/ef00034a019