Comparison of Resting and Exercise Echocardiographic Parameters as Indicators of Outcomes in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Background Both resting echocardiography and exercise echocardiography produce variables predictive of outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The aim of the present study was to compare the respective value of resting and exercise echocardiographic parameters as indicators of c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2015-02, Vol.28 (2), p.194-203
Hauptverfasser: Reant, Patricia, MD, PhD, Reynaud, Amelie, MD, Pillois, Xavier, PhD, Dijos, Marina, MD, Arsac, Florence, MD, Touche, Cecile, MD, Landelle, Mathieu, MD, Rooryck, Caroline, MD, PhD, Roudaut, Raymond, MD, Lafitte, Stephane, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Both resting echocardiography and exercise echocardiography produce variables predictive of outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The aim of the present study was to compare the respective value of resting and exercise echocardiographic parameters as indicators of clinical outcomes in patients with HCM. Methods Resting and exercise echocardiography was performed prospectively in patients with HCM evaluated at the HCM Competence Center of Bordeaux and followed up every 6 months. A composite cardiac event was defined. Results One hundred fifteen patients (mean age, 51.9 ± 15.2 years; 66% men) were evaluated by echocardiography and followed for a mean period of 19 ± 11 months. Eighteen patients (16%) reached the composite end point, including 10 progressions to New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. On rest echocardiography, in patients with cardiac events during follow-up, left atrial volume index was significantly more increased, as were lateral E/E′ ratio and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient, whereas mean global longitudinal strain (GLS) expressed in magnitude (14.0 ± 2.6% vs 17.0 ± 3.6%, P  
ISSN:0894-7317
1097-6795
DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.001