Usefulness of low- and high-volume multiple rapid swallowing during high-resolution manometry

Abstract Background It has been suggested that multiple rapid swallowing should be added to oesophageal manometry. Aim To prospectively evaluate whether 10 and 200 mL multiple rapid swallowing provide different information concerning motor function. Methods 30 consecutive patients with oesophageal s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive and liver disease 2015-02, Vol.47 (2), p.103-107
Hauptverfasser: Elvevi, Alessandra, Mauro, Aurelio, Pugliese, Delia, Bravi, Ivana, Tenca, Andrea, Consonni, Dario, Conte, Dario, Penagini, Roberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background It has been suggested that multiple rapid swallowing should be added to oesophageal manometry. Aim To prospectively evaluate whether 10 and 200 mL multiple rapid swallowing provide different information concerning motor function. Methods 30 consecutive patients with oesophageal symptoms, 13 achalasia patients after successful pneumatic dilation and 19 healthy subjects performed eight 5 mL single swallows, two 10 mL and one 200 mL multiple rapid swallowing. Results Almost all of the healthy subjects and two-thirds of the patients with oesophageal symptoms showed motor inhibition during both 10 and 200 mL multiple rapid swallowing. The oesophago-gastric pressure gradient was significantly higher during 200 mL multiple rapid swallowing within each group ( p < 0.01), and significantly higher in the achalasia patients than in the other two groups ( p < 0.0001). Presence of a contraction and increased contraction strength in comparison with single swallows were both more frequent after 10 mL than after 200 mL multiple rapid swallowing in the healthy subjects and the patients ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Motor inhibition could be similarly evaluated by means of 10 and 200 mL multiple rapid swallowing; 10 mL evaluated the after-contraction, whereas 200 mL multiple rapid swallowing was more valuable in identifying increased resistance to outflow.
ISSN:1590-8658
1878-3562
DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2014.10.007