Insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal or pre-/self-mixed insulin: A 26-week, randomised, treat-to-target trial

Abstract Aims Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a soluble co-formulation of IDeg and IAsp. This pan-Asian, 26-week trial investigated efficacy and safety of IDegAsp vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in Asian adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), inadequately controlled on once- or tw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes research and clinical practice 2015-01, Vol.107 (1), p.139-147
Hauptverfasser: Kaneko, Shizuka, Chow, Francis, Choi, Dong Seop, Taneda, Shinji, Hirao, Koichi, Park, Yongsoo, Andersen, Thomas Hasseriis, Gall, Mari-Anne, Christiansen, Jens Sandahl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a soluble co-formulation of IDeg and IAsp. This pan-Asian, 26-week trial investigated efficacy and safety of IDegAsp vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in Asian adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), inadequately controlled on once- or twice-daily (BID) basal, premixed or self-mixed insulin. Methods Participants (mean age 59.8 years, HbA1c 8.4%, FPG 7.9 mmol/L, BMI 25.4 kg/m2 ) were randomised 2:1 to BID IDegAsp ( n = 282) or BIAsp 30 ( n = 142) and continued existing metformin treatment. Insulins were administered with breakfast and main evening meal, titrated to a pre-breakfast and pre-main evening meal self-measured plasma glucose target of 4–5 mmol/L. Results IDegAsp achieved the primary endpoint of non-inferiority to BIAsp 30 for mean change in HbA1c (estimated treatment difference [ETD] IDegAsp–BIAsp 30: 0.05% points [95% CI −0.10; 0.20]). IDegAsp was superior in lowering fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (ETD −1.06 mmol/L, 95% CI −1.43; −0.70, p < 0.001), and resulted in a lower final mean daily insulin dose (0.79 U/kg vs 0.99 U/kg, estimated rate ratio [RR] 0.79, 95% CI 0.73; 0.85, p < 0.0001). Rates of overall confirmed and severe hypoglycaemia were similar between treatments, while rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia was numerically ( p = ns) lower with IDegAsp. During the maintenance period there was a trend ( p = ns) towards lower hypoglycaemia rates for IDegAsp. Conclusion In Asian adults with T2DM, IDegAsp BID effectively improves long-term glycaemic control, and compared to BIAsp 30, provides superior reductions in FPG with a lower dose, and numerically less nocturnal hypoglycaemia.
ISSN:0168-8227
1872-8227
DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2014.09.026