Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion in treating two-level adjacent cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study

Objective A retrospective study was performed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with those of single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) in treating two adjacent level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2015-02, Vol.135 (2), p.149-153
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Jiaming, Chen, Xuanyin, Liu, Zhili, Long, Xinhua, Huang, Shanhu, Shu, Yong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective A retrospective study was performed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with those of single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) in treating two adjacent level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with at least 5-year follow-up. Methods A total of 46 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the treatment of two-level CSM in our institution were evaluated from February 2002 to December 2007. In this series, 22 patients underwent two-level ACDF (group ACDF) and 24 received single-level ACCF (group ACCF). The operation duration, blood loss, perioperative complication, fusion rate, neural function (mJOA score) and the segmental lordosis of the surgical level were compared between the two groups. Results The mean follow-up time was 84.5 ± 13 months in group ACDF and 86 ± 11 months in group ACCF ( P  = 0.723). The rates of perioperative complications were 18.2 % in group ACDF and 20.8 % in group ACCF, respectively ( P  > 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in neural function (mJOA score) between the two groups at the final follow-up ( P  > 0.05), the blood loss and the operation duration were significantly less in group ACDF than those in group ACCF ( P   0.05). According to the radiographs measurement, the segmental lordosis at the surgical segment was significantly greater in group ACDF than that in group ACCF ( P  
ISSN:0936-8051
1434-3916
DOI:10.1007/s00402-014-2123-4