A functional investigation of RAN letters, digits, and objects: How similar are they?

•RAN letters, digits and objects activate common brain regions.•First neural evidence for a strong relationship between RAN letters and digits.•RAN objects may not be ideal for assessing serial reading.•Alphanumeric RAN and non-Alphanumeric RAN have different brain activation. Although rapid automat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural brain research 2014-12, Vol.275, p.157-165
Hauptverfasser: Cummine, Jacqueline, Szepesvari, Eszter, Chouinard, Brea, Hanif, Wahab, Georgiou, George K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•RAN letters, digits and objects activate common brain regions.•First neural evidence for a strong relationship between RAN letters and digits.•RAN objects may not be ideal for assessing serial reading.•Alphanumeric RAN and non-Alphanumeric RAN have different brain activation. Although rapid automatized naming (RAN) of letters, digits, and objects are popular tasks and have been used interchangeably to predict academic performance, it remains unknown if they tap into the same neural regions. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the neural overlap across different RAN tasks. Fifteen university students were assessed on RAN digits, letters, and objects using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Results showed a common neural pattern that included regions related to motor planning (e.g., cerebellum), semantic access (middle temporal gyrus), articulation (supplementary motor association, motor/pre-motor, anterior cingulate cortex), and grapheme–phoneme mapping (ventral supramarginal gyrus). However, RAN digits and letters showed many unique regions of activation over and above RAN objects particularly in semantic and articulatory regions, including precuneus, bilateral supramarginal gyrus, nucleus accumbens and thalamus. The only region unique to RAN objects included bilateral fusiform, a region commonly implicated in object processing. Overall, our results provide the first neural evidence for a stronger relationship between RAN letters and digits than when either task is compared to RAN objects.
ISSN:0166-4328
1872-7549
DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2014.08.038