In vivo DNA-protein interactions at the divergent mercury resistance (mer) promoters. II. Repressor/activator (MerR)-RNA polymerase interaction with merOP mutants
Transcription of the Tn21 mercury resistance (mer) operon is regulated by MerR which represses and activates the mer structural genes (merTPCAD) in the absence and presence of Hg(II), respectively. The promoter for the structural genes (PTPCAD) is divergently overlapped with the promoter for the reg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of biological chemistry 1993-02, Vol.268 (4), p.2632-2639 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Transcription of the Tn21 mercury resistance (mer) operon is regulated by MerR which represses and activates the mer structural
genes (merTPCAD) in the absence and presence of Hg(II), respectively. The promoter for the structural genes (PTPCAD) is divergently
overlapped with the promoter for the regulatory gene (PR), and a dyadic operator lies between the -10 and -35 hexamers of
PTPCAD. Using in vivo dimethyl sulfate and KMnO4 footprinting of mutant mer operator-promoter (merOP) DNA to observe MerR
and RNA polymerase-mediated interactions with the merOP region, we have identified three distinct domains within the palindromic
mer operator. Dyad domain I consists of the outermost bases on the left arm of the operator palindrome whose alteration causes
a shift, but apparently not a major loss, in occupancy by MerR, and no decrease in RNA polymerase occupancy. Mutants in dyad
domain I are semiconstitutive but support additional Hg(II)-induced open complex formation at PTPCAD. Dyad domain II consists
of the four highly conserved inner bases ( ... GTAC ... GTAC ... ) of the seven-base interrupted dyad, alteration of which
severely modifies both MerR and RNA polymerase contacts in the promoter region. Mutants in domain II generally allow constitutive
open complex formation at PR. One unusual mutant of this group retains most of the wild-type dyad's ability to repress both
promoters but is unable to support activation at PTPCAD in response to Hg(II), indicating that MerR undergoes a conformational
change and that the required base contacts for activation are different than those for repression. Dyad domain III is tentatively
defined by a mutant in the outermost base of the right palindrome arm which is unaffected in either MerR or RNA polymerase
occupancy, however, a second lesion within the PTPCAD -10 hexamer of this mutant limits effective open complex formation.
Other mutations lying solely within the -10 RNA polymerase recognition hexamer of PTPCAD are similarly competent in both MerR
and RNA polymerase binding, but inadequate for open complex formation. One such mutant also affects the overlapping -10 hexamer
of PR and results in reduced occupancy by both MerR and RNA polymerase, likely as a result of inefficient transcriptional
initiation of merR mRNA. Finally, mutations affecting the -35 hexamer of PTPCAD bind MerR but not RNA polymerase. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9258 1083-351X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)53821-7 |