Analysis of Vascular Closure Devices After Transbrachial Artery Access
Introduction: We seek to determine whether vascular closure devices (VCDs) are safe and effective for brachial artery access. Methods: A retrospective review of brachial artery access using either manual compression (MC) or a VCD for hemostasis from November 2005 to February 2011 was performed. Resu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vascular and endovascular surgery 2014-10, Vol.48 (7-8), p.466-469 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction:
We seek to determine whether vascular closure devices (VCDs) are safe and effective for brachial artery access.
Methods:
A retrospective review of brachial artery access using either manual compression (MC) or a VCD for hemostasis from November 2005 to February 2011 was performed.
Results:
Brachial artery access was performed on 154 limbs: MC on 134 limbs and VCD on 20 limbs. The incidence of thrombotic (VCD n = 0 [0%] vs MC n = 7 [5.2%], P = .37), hemorrhagic complications (VCD n = 1 [5%] vs MC n = 7 [5.2%], P = .72), or major adverse events (VCD n = 1 [5%] vs MC n = 16 [12%], P = .32) was not significantly different between the techniques. After univariate and multivariate analysis, female sex (P = .07, relative risk [RR] = 5.7), sheath size > 6F (P = .008, RR = 14.6), and diagnostic versus interventional procedure (P = .04, RR = 0.4) all impacted the occurrence of thrombosis.
Conclusions:
Use of VCD in the brachial artery following an endovascular procedure showed equivalence to MC. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1538-5744 1938-9116 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1538574414551576 |