Seismic performance of torsionally stiff and flexible multi-story concentrically steel braced buildings

SUMMARY It is expected that application of torsion provisions in typical seismic codes shows different levels of efficiency for torsionally stiff and flexible buildings. This paper studies difference in performances of a range of code designed torsionally stiff and flexible five‐story building model...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The structural design of tall and special buildings 2014-02, Vol.23 (2), p.146-160
Hauptverfasser: Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A., Moghadam, A. S., Ghafory Ashtiany, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 160
container_issue 2
container_start_page 146
container_title The structural design of tall and special buildings
container_volume 23
creator Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A.
Moghadam, A. S.
Ghafory Ashtiany, M.
description SUMMARY It is expected that application of torsion provisions in typical seismic codes shows different levels of efficiency for torsionally stiff and flexible buildings. This paper studies difference in performances of a range of code designed torsionally stiff and flexible five‐story building models. The models are classified in eight configurations to cover common range of buildings designed with the seismic provisions of Iranian Standard 2800 as a typical seismic design code. Seismic nonlinear dynamic time history behavior of eight building models subjected to seven horizontal bi‐directional design spectra compatible ground motions is investigated. These models cover a wide band of very torsionally stiff to very flexible buildings. Response parameters are element ductility demand and building story drift ratio. These criteria are appropriate indices for structural and nonstructural damages, respectively. The results indicate that the present linear static procedure of building codes such as the Iranian Standard 2800 is not generally adequate for structures with very low torsional stiffness. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/tal.1031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642623963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1642278863</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3641-c11be8891dc903249a76e7498bda80fa870bfb82dea154fe15ed99a24e2f41603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtLAzEQB_BFFKxV8CMEvHhZzWMfybGItmpRwYrHkM1OJJrdrcku2m9van2AJ08zh98MyfyT5JDgE4IxPe2Viw0jW8mI5BlJS4759ndfimw32QvhGWMicM5GydM92NBYjZbgTecb1WpAnUF954PtWuXcCoXeGoNUWyPj4N1WDlAzuN6mIaoV0l2caXtv9ZcGcKjySkONqsG62rZPYT_ZMcoFOPiq4-Th4nxxNkvnt9PLs8k81ayIL9SEVMC5ILUWmNFMqLKAMhO8qhXHRvESV6bitAYVf2SA5FALoWgG1GSkwGycHG_2Ln33OkDoZWODBudUC90QJCkyWlAmCvYvSkvOP-nRH_rcDT5eZ61KxnOOSRFVulFv1sFKLr1tlF9JguU6GRmTketk5GIyX9dfb-PN3n-88i8yLi1z-XgzlbP5NZtd3VGJ2Qd1_5Jg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1673858016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic performance of torsionally stiff and flexible multi-story concentrically steel braced buildings</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A. ; Moghadam, A. S. ; Ghafory Ashtiany, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A. ; Moghadam, A. S. ; Ghafory Ashtiany, M.</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY It is expected that application of torsion provisions in typical seismic codes shows different levels of efficiency for torsionally stiff and flexible buildings. This paper studies difference in performances of a range of code designed torsionally stiff and flexible five‐story building models. The models are classified in eight configurations to cover common range of buildings designed with the seismic provisions of Iranian Standard 2800 as a typical seismic design code. Seismic nonlinear dynamic time history behavior of eight building models subjected to seven horizontal bi‐directional design spectra compatible ground motions is investigated. These models cover a wide band of very torsionally stiff to very flexible buildings. Response parameters are element ductility demand and building story drift ratio. These criteria are appropriate indices for structural and nonstructural damages, respectively. The results indicate that the present linear static procedure of building codes such as the Iranian Standard 2800 is not generally adequate for structures with very low torsional stiffness. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-7794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-7808</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tal.1031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Braced ; Building codes ; Buildings ; Demand ; nonlinear dynamic analysis ; Nonlinear dynamics ; performance level ; Seismic design ; Seismic response ; Standard 2800 ; story drift ratio ; torsionally flexible ; torsionally stiff</subject><ispartof>The structural design of tall and special buildings, 2014-02, Vol.23 (2), p.146-160</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3641-c11be8891dc903249a76e7498bda80fa870bfb82dea154fe15ed99a24e2f41603</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ftal.1031$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ftal.1031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghadam, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafory Ashtiany, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic performance of torsionally stiff and flexible multi-story concentrically steel braced buildings</title><title>The structural design of tall and special buildings</title><addtitle>Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build</addtitle><description>SUMMARY It is expected that application of torsion provisions in typical seismic codes shows different levels of efficiency for torsionally stiff and flexible buildings. This paper studies difference in performances of a range of code designed torsionally stiff and flexible five‐story building models. The models are classified in eight configurations to cover common range of buildings designed with the seismic provisions of Iranian Standard 2800 as a typical seismic design code. Seismic nonlinear dynamic time history behavior of eight building models subjected to seven horizontal bi‐directional design spectra compatible ground motions is investigated. These models cover a wide band of very torsionally stiff to very flexible buildings. Response parameters are element ductility demand and building story drift ratio. These criteria are appropriate indices for structural and nonstructural damages, respectively. The results indicate that the present linear static procedure of building codes such as the Iranian Standard 2800 is not generally adequate for structures with very low torsional stiffness. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Braced</subject><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>nonlinear dynamic analysis</subject><subject>Nonlinear dynamics</subject><subject>performance level</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Standard 2800</subject><subject>story drift ratio</subject><subject>torsionally flexible</subject><subject>torsionally stiff</subject><issn>1541-7794</issn><issn>1541-7808</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0UtLAzEQB_BFFKxV8CMEvHhZzWMfybGItmpRwYrHkM1OJJrdrcku2m9van2AJ08zh98MyfyT5JDgE4IxPe2Viw0jW8mI5BlJS4759ndfimw32QvhGWMicM5GydM92NBYjZbgTecb1WpAnUF954PtWuXcCoXeGoNUWyPj4N1WDlAzuN6mIaoV0l2caXtv9ZcGcKjySkONqsG62rZPYT_ZMcoFOPiq4-Th4nxxNkvnt9PLs8k81ayIL9SEVMC5ILUWmNFMqLKAMhO8qhXHRvESV6bitAYVf2SA5FALoWgG1GSkwGycHG_2Ln33OkDoZWODBudUC90QJCkyWlAmCvYvSkvOP-nRH_rcDT5eZ61KxnOOSRFVulFv1sFKLr1tlF9JguU6GRmTketk5GIyX9dfb-PN3n-88i8yLi1z-XgzlbP5NZtd3VGJ2Qd1_5Jg</recordid><startdate>20140210</startdate><enddate>20140210</enddate><creator>Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A.</creator><creator>Moghadam, A. S.</creator><creator>Ghafory Ashtiany, M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140210</creationdate><title>Seismic performance of torsionally stiff and flexible multi-story concentrically steel braced buildings</title><author>Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A. ; Moghadam, A. S. ; Ghafory Ashtiany, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3641-c11be8891dc903249a76e7498bda80fa870bfb82dea154fe15ed99a24e2f41603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Braced</topic><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>nonlinear dynamic analysis</topic><topic>Nonlinear dynamics</topic><topic>performance level</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Standard 2800</topic><topic>story drift ratio</topic><topic>torsionally flexible</topic><topic>torsionally stiff</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghadam, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafory Ashtiany, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>The structural design of tall and special buildings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A.</au><au>Moghadam, A. S.</au><au>Ghafory Ashtiany, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic performance of torsionally stiff and flexible multi-story concentrically steel braced buildings</atitle><jtitle>The structural design of tall and special buildings</jtitle><addtitle>Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build</addtitle><date>2014-02-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>146-160</pages><issn>1541-7794</issn><eissn>1541-7808</eissn><abstract>SUMMARY It is expected that application of torsion provisions in typical seismic codes shows different levels of efficiency for torsionally stiff and flexible buildings. This paper studies difference in performances of a range of code designed torsionally stiff and flexible five‐story building models. The models are classified in eight configurations to cover common range of buildings designed with the seismic provisions of Iranian Standard 2800 as a typical seismic design code. Seismic nonlinear dynamic time history behavior of eight building models subjected to seven horizontal bi‐directional design spectra compatible ground motions is investigated. These models cover a wide band of very torsionally stiff to very flexible buildings. Response parameters are element ductility demand and building story drift ratio. These criteria are appropriate indices for structural and nonstructural damages, respectively. The results indicate that the present linear static procedure of building codes such as the Iranian Standard 2800 is not generally adequate for structures with very low torsional stiffness. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/tal.1031</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-7794
ispartof The structural design of tall and special buildings, 2014-02, Vol.23 (2), p.146-160
issn 1541-7794
1541-7808
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642623963
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Braced
Building codes
Buildings
Demand
nonlinear dynamic analysis
Nonlinear dynamics
performance level
Seismic design
Seismic response
Standard 2800
story drift ratio
torsionally flexible
torsionally stiff
title Seismic performance of torsionally stiff and flexible multi-story concentrically steel braced buildings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T23%3A28%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20performance%20of%20torsionally%20stiff%20and%20flexible%20multi-story%20concentrically%20steel%20braced%20buildings&rft.jtitle=The%20structural%20design%20of%20tall%20and%20special%20buildings&rft.au=Haj%20Seiyed%20Taghia,%20S.%20A.&rft.date=2014-02-10&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=146-160&rft.issn=1541-7794&rft.eissn=1541-7808&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tal.1031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1642278863%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1673858016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true