Single-Incision Transumbilical Surgery (SITUS) versus Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized comparative study of performance with novices in a dry laboratory
Purpose To evaluate the Single-Incision Transumbilical Surgery (SITUS) technique as compared to an established laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) technique ( Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery , SPLS) and conventional laparoscopy (CLS) in a surgical simulator model. Methods Sixty-three medica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of urology 2015-01, Vol.33 (1), p.51-57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To evaluate the
Single-Incision Transumbilical Surgery
(SITUS) technique as compared to an established laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) technique (
Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery
, SPLS) and conventional laparoscopy (CLS) in a surgical simulator model.
Methods
Sixty-three medical students without previous laparoscopic experience were randomly assigned to one of the three groups (SITUS, SPLS and CLS). Subjects were asked to perform five standardized tasks of increasing difficulty adopted from the
Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
curriculum. Statistical evaluation included task completion times and accuracy.
Results
Overall performances of all tasks (except precision cutting) were significantly faster and of higher accuracy in the CLS and SITUS groups than in the SPLS group (
p
= 0.004 to
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00345-014-1266-9 |