alpha -Fe sub(2)O sub(3) nanowires deposited diatomite: highly efficient absorbents for the removal of arsenic

alpha -Fe sub(2)O sub(3) nanowires deposited diatomite was prepared using a precipitation-deposition method with FeCl sub(3) as metal source and (NH sub(2)) sub(2)CO aqueous solution as precipitating agent. Physicochemical properties of the samples were characterized by means of numerous techniques,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of materials chemistry. A, Materials for energy and sustainability Materials for energy and sustainability, 2013-06, Vol.1 (26), p.7729-7737
Hauptverfasser: Du, Yucheng, Fan, Haiguang, Wang, Liping, Wang, Jinshu, Wu, Junshu, Dai, Hongxing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:alpha -Fe sub(2)O sub(3) nanowires deposited diatomite was prepared using a precipitation-deposition method with FeCl sub(3) as metal source and (NH sub(2)) sub(2)CO aqueous solution as precipitating agent. Physicochemical properties of the samples were characterized by means of numerous techniques, and their efficiency for the removal of As(iii) and As(v) was determined. It is found that the solution pH value, reaction temperature, reaction time, and FeCl sub(3) concentration had effects on the alpha -Fe sub(2)O sub(3) amount loaded on the diatomite. Parameters, such as adsorbent amount, adsorption time, adsorption temperature, pH value, and initial As(iii) or As(v) concentration, could influence the As(iii) or As(v) removal efficiency of the alpha -Fe sub(2)O sub(3) nanowires/diatomite sample (prepared with a 8 wt% FeCl sub(3) aqueous solution at pH = 4.5 and 50 degree C for 35 h) for the removal of As(iii) and As(v). Over the alpha -Fe sub(2)O sub(3)/diatom ite sample at pH = 3.5, the maximal As(iii) and As(v) adsorption capacities were 60.6 and 81.2 mg g super(-1), and the maximal As(iii) and As(v) removal efficiency was 99.98 and 100%, respectively. The Langmuir model was more suitable for the adsorption of As(v), whereas the Freundlich model was more suitable for the adsorption of As(iii). The adsorption mechanism of the sample was also discussed.
ISSN:2050-7488
2050-7496
DOI:10.1039/c3ta11124e