ecological classification of odonate mating systems: the relative influence of natural, inter- and intra-sexual selection on males

We separate the mating systems of odonates into two main groups: non‐resource and resource‐based systems. These two groups comprise five classes of mating system: encounter‐limited mating, free female choice, resource‐limitation, resource‐control and female‐control. These classes are consistent with previous classifications of odonate mating systems and with the overall classification of mating systems by Emlen & Oring (1977: Science, 797: 215–223). Whereas Emlen & Oring's classification of mating systems was concerned with differences in sexual selection between mating systems, our classification of odonate mating systems also addresses the influence of inter‐and intra‐sexual selection on males within a mating system. Predictions about such relationships are useful in multivariate analysis of odonate lifetime reproduction success. Among most odonate mating systems, much of the sexual selection on males results from male‐male competition for access to mates. Sexual selection via female choice is relatively less important or operates indirectly through females' choices of times or places to mate. We place resource‐control and resource‐limitation at opposite ends of a resource‐defence continuum and postulate female choice will have greater influence in mating systems that are more like a resource‐limitation system and less influence in mating systems that are more like resource‐control. Sexual selection is likely to be weak in species that resort to encounter‐limited mating where longevity is likely to contribute strongly to variation in reproductive success. Females have limited opportunity to exercise choice among males in the female‐control mating system and in this system selection is most likely to operate on male characters which contribute to their efficiency in searching for and capturing mates. Predictions about the differences in the intensity of sexual selection between different odonate mating systems should be made on the basis of the variation in the number of potential fertilizations per male or even per ejaculate, rather than the number of fertilizable females per male. Very different mating systems could result in similar patterns of variation in male reproductive success.