Prognostic Evaluation of Feline Mammary Carcinomas: A Review of the Literature

A large number of studies have investigated feline mammary tumors in an attempt to identify prognostic markers and generate comparative analyses with human breast cancer. Nevertheless, a retrospective base of assessments and the lack of standardization in methodology and study design have caused wea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary pathology 2015-01, Vol.52 (1), p.46-60
Hauptverfasser: Zappulli, V., Rasotto, R., Caliari, D., Mainenti, M., Peña, L., Goldschmidt, M. H., Kiupel, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A large number of studies have investigated feline mammary tumors in an attempt to identify prognostic markers and generate comparative analyses with human breast cancer. Nevertheless, a retrospective base of assessments and the lack of standardization in methodology and study design have caused weakness in study results, making comparison difficult. We examined feline mammary tumor publications and evaluated postulated prognostic parameters according to the recently published “Recommended Guidelines for the Conduct and Evaluation of Prognostic Studies in Veterinary Oncology.” Using these criteria, we determined with statistically significant reliability that prognostic parameters for feline mammary tumors are tumor grading and lymph node/lymphovascular invasion. Furthermore, tumor subtype, size, and staging are worthy of further standardized investigation. We present statistical significance for each studied parameter as well as its relevance to disease progression and survival. Our evaluation suggests that marker expression (ie, Ki67, HER2, ER) may provide relevant information applicable for therapeutic predictions; however, consensus efforts and protocol standardization are needed. We identify and discuss major points of concern—such as sample preservation and selection, standardization of immunohistochemical protocols, and evaluation of results—to provide support for subsequent reliable analyses.
ISSN:0300-9858
1544-2217
DOI:10.1177/0300985814528221