Prehospital fluid resuscitation in hypotensive trauma patients: Do we need a tailored approach?

Abstract Aim The ideal strategy for prehospital intravenous fluid resuscitation in trauma remains unclear. Fluid resuscitation may reverse shock but aggravate bleeding by raising blood pressure and haemodilution. We examined the effect of prehospital i.v. fluid on the physiologic status and need for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2015-01, Vol.46 (1), p.4-9
Hauptverfasser: Geeraedts, Leo M.G, Pothof, Leonie A.H, Caldwell, Erica, de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S.M, D’Amours, Scott K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aim The ideal strategy for prehospital intravenous fluid resuscitation in trauma remains unclear. Fluid resuscitation may reverse shock but aggravate bleeding by raising blood pressure and haemodilution. We examined the effect of prehospital i.v. fluid on the physiologic status and need for blood transfusion in hypotensive trauma patients after their arrival in the emergency department (ED). Methods Retrospective analysis of trauma patients ( n = 941) with field hypotension presenting to a level 1 trauma centre. Regression models were used to investigate associations between prehospital fluid volumes and shock index and blood transfusion respectively in the emergency department and mortality at 24 h. Results A 1 L increase of prehospital i.v. fluid was associated with a 7% decrease of shock index in the emergency department ( p < 0.001). Volumes of 0.5–1 L and 1–2 L were associated with reduced likelihood of shock as compared to volumes of 0–0.5 L: OR 0.61 ( p = 0.03) and OR 0.54 ( p = 0.02), respectively. Volumes of 1–2 L were also associated with an increased likelihood of receiving blood transfusion in ED: OR 3.27 ( p < 0.001). Patients who had received volumes of >2 L have a much greater likelihood of receiving blood transfusion in ED: OR 9.92 ( p < 0.001). Mortality at 24 h was not associated with prehospital i.v. fluids. Conclusion In hypotensive trauma patients, prehospital i.v. fluids were associated with a reduction of likelihood of shock upon arrival in ED. However, volumes of >1 L were associated with a markedly increased likelihood of receiving blood transfusion in ED. Therefore, decision making regarding prehospital i.v. fluid resuscitation is critical and may need to be tailored to the individual situation. Further research is needed to clarify whether a causal relationship exists between prehospital i.v. fluid volume and blood transfusion. Also, prospective trials on prehospital i.v. fluid resuscitation strategies in specific patient subgroups (e.g. traumatic brain injury and concomitant haemorrhage) are warranted.
ISSN:0020-1383
1879-0267
DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.001