EUS is superior for detection of pancreatic lesions compared with standard imaging in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Background In multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are the leading MEN1-related cause of death. Objective To evaluate EUS and11 C-5-hydroxytryptophan positron emission tomography (11 C-5-HTP PET), compared with the recommended screening techniques in M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2015, Vol.81 (1), p.159-167.e2
Hauptverfasser: van Asselt, Sophie J., MD, PhD, Brouwers, Adrienne H., MD, PhD, van Dullemen, Hendrik M., MD, PhD, van der Jagt, Eric J., MD, PhD, Bongaerts, Alfons H.H., MD, Kema, Ido P., PhD, Koopmans, Klaas P., MD, PhD, Valk, Gerlof D., MD, PhD, Timmers, Henri J., MD, PhD, de Herder, Wouter W., MD, PhD, Feelders, Richard A., MD, PhD, Fockens, Paul, MD, PhD, Sluiter, Wim J., PhD, de Vries, Elisabeth G.E., MD, PhD, Links, Thera P., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background In multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are the leading MEN1-related cause of death. Objective To evaluate EUS and11 C-5-hydroxytryptophan positron emission tomography (11 C-5-HTP PET), compared with the recommended screening techniques in MEN1 patients for early detection of pNETs. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Tertiary-care university medical center. Patients This study involved 41 patients with a proven MEN1 mutation or with one MEN1 manifestation and a mutation carrier as a first-degree family member, with recent screening by abdominal CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). Interventions EUS by using a linear Pentax echoendoscope and Hitachi EUB-525 and11 C-5-HTP PET. Main Outcome Measurements Patient-based and lesion-based positivity for pNET was calculated for all imaging techniques. The McNemar test was used to compare the yield of the 4 imaging techniques. Results In 35 of 41 patients, 107 pancreatic lesions were detected in total. EUS detected 101 pancreatic lesions in 34 patients,11 C-5-HTP PET detected 35 lesions in 19 patients, and CT/MRI + SRS detected 32 lesions in 18 patients ( P  < .001).11 C-5-HTP PET performed similarly to CT/MRI + SRS and better compared with SRS only (13 lesions in 12 patients), both at a patient-based and lesion-based level ( P  < .05). Limitations Single-center study. Conclusion EUS is superior to CT/MRI + SRS for pancreatic lesion detection in patients with MEN1. In this setting,11 C-5-HTP PET is not useful. We recommend EUS as the first-choice pancreas imaging technique in patients with MEN1. (Clinical trial registration number: NTR1668 .)
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.037