Combining mechanistic best-estimate analysis and level 1 probabilistic risk assessment

Traditionally, both deterministic and probabilistic methods have been used in the safety analysis of nuclear reactors. Both of these methods have evolved in recent years to a more sophisticated treatment of uncertainties in the anallyis. In particular, deterministic analysts have moved away from the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reliability engineering & system safety 1993, Vol.39 (1), p.89-108
Hauptverfasser: Martz, H.F, Hamm, L.L, Reed, W.H, Pan, P.Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Traditionally, both deterministic and probabilistic methods have been used in the safety analysis of nuclear reactors. Both of these methods have evolved in recent years to a more sophisticated treatment of uncertainties in the anallyis. In particular, deterministic analysts have moved away from the traditional conservative methods to best-estimate techniques that attempt to account for uncertainties in all phases of the calculations. Because of this, a tighter and more formal coupling between the deterministic and probabilistic methods has become possible. This paper introduces a formal methodology for such combination, presents an illustrative example, and discusses a new technique for deriving acceptance criteria for deterministic analyses based on probabilistic considerations.
ISSN:0951-8320
1879-0836
DOI:10.1016/0951-8320(93)90151-N