Physicians’ attitude toward recurrent hypercalcemia in terminally ill cancer patients

Background There is no consensus regarding whether cancer-induced hypercalcemia should be treated up until the patient’s death. The primary aim of this study was to clarify physicians’ attitude toward treating recurrent hypercalcemia in terminally ill cancer patients and associated factors. Methods...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2015-01, Vol.23 (1), p.177-183
Hauptverfasser: Shimada, Akira, Mori, Ichiro, Maeda, Isseki, Watanabe, Hidekazu, Kikuchi, Nobutaka, Ding, Hansheng, Morita, Tatsuya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background There is no consensus regarding whether cancer-induced hypercalcemia should be treated up until the patient’s death. The primary aim of this study was to clarify physicians’ attitude toward treating recurrent hypercalcemia in terminally ill cancer patients and associated factors. Methods A nationwide, cross-sectional survey was performed involving 757 physicians of the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine. Physicians’ attitude toward treating hypercalcemia in terminally ill patients was assessed based on the response to the question: do you agree that you provide medical treatment for recurrent hypercalcemia up until a patient’s death? As the potential determinants of physicians’ attitudes, we examined their characteristics, beliefs about hypercalcemia, and beliefs about a good death. Results We obtained a total of 380 (50.2 %) analyzable responses. A total of 163 physicians (43 %) agreed that hypercalcemia should be treated up until the patient’s death, while the remaining 217 physicians (57 %) disagreed. The independent determinants of the attitude included the following: physicians’ specialty, belief that hypercalcemia treatment improves pain, belief that hypercalcemia treatment improves nausea, belief that hypercalcemia treatment improves quality of life, belief that hypercalcemia treatment prolongs life, belief that the effect of hypercalcemia treatment reduces gradually, belief that death with hypercalcemia is less distressing, and the perception that being mentally clear is important for a good death. Conclusion Japanese physicians had different attitudes toward treating hypercalcemia in terminally ill patients. Physicians’ beliefs about the efficacy of medical treatment for hypercalcemia markedly influenced their attitudes. Clarifying evidence on the effect of hypercalcemia treatment on patients’ symptoms and prognoses is strongly encouraged.
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-014-2355-4