Light and shadow: Visual recognition of the stationary environment by leopard frogs

•Frogs are attracted to dark, stationary objects.•Attraction to stationary objects depends on relative reflectance.•Probability of attraction to dark objects depends on their size.•Attraction to dark objects is not dependent on overall ambient light levels.•Preference for a dark object versus a ligh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural processes 2014-09, Vol.107, p.127-132
Hauptverfasser: Recktenwald, Eric W., Skorina, Laura K., Neeb, Christopher N., Dudkin, Elizabeth A., Gruberg, Edward R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Frogs are attracted to dark, stationary objects.•Attraction to stationary objects depends on relative reflectance.•Probability of attraction to dark objects depends on their size.•Attraction to dark objects is not dependent on overall ambient light levels.•Preference for a dark object versus a lighted window depends on ambient light level. We determined how leopard frogs respond to non-moving aspects of the environment. We have discovered that these frogs are attracted to dark, stationary, opaque objects. This attraction depends on the relative reflectance of the object, i.e., the darker the block, the more attractive it is, and the attraction is found under both bright and dim ambient light levels. Larger blocks are more attractive than smaller blocks, but frogs are still attracted to blocks much smaller than themselves. Previous studies have shown that frogs are also attracted to sources of light. Using a choice experiment, we show that the probability a frog will choose a dark object versus a light source depends on the intensity of the light source relative to the intensity of the ambient light. The frog only moves toward a light source when it is at least 20 times brighter than the brightest object in the environment. These findings help to clarify the frog's “phototactic” nature.
ISSN:0376-6357
1872-8308
DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.008