Water treatment and waste characterization evaluation of an intensive recirculating fish production system
A combination of two different technologies used for fish production was evaluated at the North Carolina State University (NCSU) F̀ish Barn facility. The combined system included the ECOFISH∗ tank, developed at the Norwegian Hydrotechnical Laboratory (NHL) at SINTEF (Trondheim, Norway) and water tre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquacultural engineering 1997-05, Vol.16 (3), p.133-147 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A combination of two different technologies used for fish production was evaluated at the North Carolina State University (NCSU) F̀ish Barn facility. The combined system included the ECOFISH∗ tank, developed at the Norwegian Hydrotechnical Laboratory (NHL) at SINTEF (Trondheim, Norway) and water treatment and recycle technology designed at NCSU. Approximately 2170 fingerling tilapia (
Oreochromis niloticus, Oreochromis niloticus × Oreochromis aureus) were grown from 3.6 to 507 g in 177 days in a 20 m
3 four-zone tank. The system design included patented particle traps at the bottom of each zone to remove feed waste and excrement, sludge collectors where the removed particles settled, a rotating screen filter for suspended solids removal, a high-rate linear-path trickling biological filter for nitrification, and two down-flow columns for oxygen injection. The measured suspended solids level in the tank zones were usually less than 7.5 mg l
−1. Based on six efficiency tests with a mean total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) concentration in the culture tank of 0.62 mg l
−1, the biofilter removed approximately 65% on a single pass through the filter, with an average removal rate per unit of filter surface area of 0.33 g TAN m
−2 day
−1. Sampling every 4 h over a 24-h period showed variability in concentrations and TAN removal rates by the biofilter. Six efficiency tests on the sludge collectors and the screen filter showed 80% and 41% suspended solids removal efficiency, respectively, based on the influent and effluent concentrations. On a daily basis, the sludge collectors and the screen filter each removed about 18% of feed volatile solids input, respectively, based on three 24-h periods studied. Fresh water use averaged approximately 1500 l day
−1, which was about 7% of the system volume. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0144-8609 1873-5614 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0144-8609(96)01022-9 |