Correction method for the physical dose calculated using Clarkson integration at the center of the spread-out Bragg peak for asymmetric field in carbon-ion radiotherapy

Abstract Purpose We previously proposed a calculation method using Clarkson integration to obtain the physical dose at the center of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) for a treatment beam, the measurement point of which agrees with the isocenter [Tajiri et al. Med. Phys. 2013; 40: 071733–1–5]. Howeve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physica medica 2014-12, Vol.30 (8), p.985-988
Hauptverfasser: Tajiri, Minoru, Maeda, Takamasa, Isobe, Yoshiharu, Tanimoto, Katsuyuki, Shibayama, Koichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Purpose We previously proposed a calculation method using Clarkson integration to obtain the physical dose at the center of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) for a treatment beam, the measurement point of which agrees with the isocenter [Tajiri et al. Med. Phys. 2013; 40: 071733–1–5]. However, at the measurement point which does not agree with the isocenter, the physical dose calculated by this method might have a large error. For this error, we propose a correction method. Materials and methods To confirm whether the error can be corrected using in-air off axis ratio (OAR), we measured the physical dose at the center of an asymmetric square field and a symmetric square field and in-air OAR. For beams of which the measurement point does not agree with the isocenter, as applied to prostate cancer patients, the physical dose calculated using Clarkson integration was corrected with in-air OAR. Results The maximum difference between the physical dose measured at the center of an asymmetric square field and the product of in-air OAR and the physical dose at the center of a symmetric square field was – 0.12%. For beams as applied to prostate cancer patients, the differences between the measured physical doses and the physical doses corrected using in-air OAR were −0.17 ± 0.23%. Conclusions The physical dose at the measurement point which does not agree with the isocenter, can be obtained from in-air OAR at the isocenter plane and the physical dose at the center of the SOBP on the beam axis.
ISSN:1120-1797
1724-191X
DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.07.003