Comparative Evaluation of Calcium Hypochlorite and Sodium Hypochlorite Associated with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation on Antimicrobial Activity of a Root Canal System Infected with Enterococcus faecalis : An In Vitro Study

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to compare in vitro the effectiveness of calcium hypochlorite (Ca[OCl]2 ) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) associated with passive ultrasonic irrigation in root canals of bovine teeth infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Methods The root canals of 6...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2014-12, Vol.40 (12), p.1953-1957
Hauptverfasser: de Almeida, Ana Paula, DDSc, Souza, Matheus Albino, PhD, Miyagaki, Daniela Cristina, PhD, Bello, Yuri Dal, MSc, Cecchin, Doglas, PhD, Farina, Ana Paula, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to compare in vitro the effectiveness of calcium hypochlorite (Ca[OCl]2 ) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) associated with passive ultrasonic irrigation in root canals of bovine teeth infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Methods The root canals of 60 single-rooted bovine extracted teeth were enlarged up to a file 45, autoclaved, inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis , and incubated for 30 days. The samples were divided into 6 groups ( n  = 10) according to the protocol for decontamination: G1: no treatment; G2: distilled water; G3: 2.5% NaOCl; G4: 2.5% Ca(OCl)2 ; G5: 2.5% NaOCl with ultrasonic activation; and G6: 2.5% Ca(OCl)2 with ultrasonic activation (US). Microbiological testing (colony-forming unit [CFU] counting) was performed to evaluate and show, respectively, the effectiveness of the proposed treatments. Data were subjected to 1-way analysis of variance followed by the post hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05). Results Groups 1 and 2 showed the highest mean contamination (3.26 log10  CFU/mL and 2.69 log10  CFU/mL, respectively), which was statistically different from all other groups ( P  
ISSN:0099-2399
1878-3554
DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.025