Inhaled versus nebulised tobramycin: A real world comparison in adult cystic fibrosis (CF)

Abstract Background There are no published data on real-life clinical experience comparing inhaled antibiotic therapy via new rapid delivery systems with nebulised antibiotic therapy in CF. This real world study compares safety, effectiveness and tolerability using tobramycin inhaled powder (TIP) ve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cystic fibrosis 2014-12, Vol.13 (6), p.692-698
Hauptverfasser: Harrison, M.J, McCarthy, M, Fleming, C, Hickey, C, Shortt, C, Eustace, J.A, Murphy, D.M, Plant, B.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background There are no published data on real-life clinical experience comparing inhaled antibiotic therapy via new rapid delivery systems with nebulised antibiotic therapy in CF. This real world study compares safety, effectiveness and tolerability using tobramycin inhaled powder (TIP) versus tobramycin inhaled solution (TIS). Methods Adult patients with CF commencing TIP ( n = 78) completed a questionnaire assessing safety, efficacy, tolerability, patient-satisfaction and self-reported adherence to TIS at baseline and during 12 months of TIP therapy. FEV1 % predicted and exacerbation rate were recorded at each visit. Results There was a significant improvement in adherence scores, with a significant decrease in the number of intravenous antibiotic courses received during 12 months of TIP compared with the preceding 12 months using TIS. 94% of patients who had previously used TIS preferred TIP therapy over TIS. Conclusions Inhaled powder tobramycin in CF is associated with improved adherence, tolerability and decreased exacerbation rates compared to nebulised treatment in real-life practice.
ISSN:1569-1993
1873-5010
DOI:10.1016/j.jcf.2014.04.004