New formula for evaluation of the QT interval in patients with left bundle branch block

Background Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QT prolongation both are associated with a worse prognosis. LBBB lengthens the QT interval. To date it is not known whether QT prolongation during LBBB differs in repolarization from QT prolongation during narrow QRS. Objective The purpose of the presen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2014-12, Vol.11 (12), p.2273-2277
Hauptverfasser: Bogossian, Harilaos, MD, Frommeyer, Gerrit, MD, Ninios, Ilias, MD, Hasan, Fuad, MD, Nguyen, Quy Suu, MD, Karosiene, Zana, MD, Mijic, Dejan, MD, Kloppe, Axel, MD, Suleiman, Hawal, MD, Bandorski, Dirk, MD, Seyfarth, Melchior, MD, Lemke, Bernd, MD, Eckardt, Lars, MD, Zarse, Markus, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QT prolongation both are associated with a worse prognosis. LBBB lengthens the QT interval. To date it is not known whether QT prolongation during LBBB differs in repolarization from QT prolongation during narrow QRS. Objective The purpose of the present proof-of-concept-study was to develop a formula that allows comparison of the adjusted QT interval during LBBB with reference values and thereby allows interpretation of the QT interval irrespective of QRS widening. Methods Sixty consecutive patients with sinus rhythm (SR) and narrow QRS underwent electrophysiologic study for ablation. In all patients, the intrinsic QRS ,QT, and JT times were measured during SR, and ventricular pacing from both the right ventricular apex (RVA) and the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) caused LBBB. We determined prolongation of the QT during as compared to SR (ΔQT). ΔQT was then divided by the QRS length during pacing QRS (QRSb). This describes the percentage of the QRS duration at LBBB, which must be subtracted from the measured QT (QTb) to determine the modified QT interval (QTm). Results The ratio of ΔQT to paced QRS was calculated as 48.3% (RVA) and 48.8% (RVOT) (mean 48.5%). The ratio intrinsic of JTi to paced JT was 1.0055 (RVA) and 1.0087 (RVOT). There was no significant difference in intrinsic JT vs paced JT ( P = .2). Conclusion Right ventricular pacing causes prolongation of the QT due to a paced LBBB without prolongation of the JT time. In our study, we showed that QT prolongation caused by LBBB constitutes 48.5% of the QRS width. This is the value that must be subtracted from the measured QT in LBBB in order to estimate the modified QT. Thus, the resulting formula for “modified QT” estimation in LBBB is QTm = QTb – 48.5% * (QRSb).
ISSN:1547-5271
1556-3871
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.08.026