Anthelmintic efficacy of ivermectin and abamectin, administered orally for seven consecutive days (100 µg/kg/day), against nematodes in naturally infected pigs

•We compare the effects of ivermectin and abamectin against helminthes of swine.•Against H. rubidus, S. ransomi, A. suum and M. salmi the efficacy was >95%.•One strain of O. dentatum was resistant to Ivermectin.•One strain of T. suis was resistant to Ivermectin and abamectin. The present study ai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in veterinary science 2014-12, Vol.97 (3), p.546-549
Hauptverfasser: Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti, Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio Pires, Felippelli, Gustavo, Cruz, Breno Cayeiro, Buzulini, Carolina, Maciel, Willian Giquelin, Fávero, Flávia Carolina, Gomes, Lucas Vinicius Costa, Prando, Luciana, Bichuette, Murilo A., dos Santos, Thais Rabelo, da Costa, Alvimar José
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We compare the effects of ivermectin and abamectin against helminthes of swine.•Against H. rubidus, S. ransomi, A. suum and M. salmi the efficacy was >95%.•One strain of O. dentatum was resistant to Ivermectin.•One strain of T. suis was resistant to Ivermectin and abamectin. The present study aimed to evaluate ivermectin and abamectin, both administered orally in naturally infected domestic swine, as well as analysing if the EPG (eggs per gram of faeces) values were equivalent with the ivermectin and abamectin efficacy obtained by parasitological necropsies. The animals were randomly selected based on the average of three consecutive EPG counts of Strongylida, Ascaris suum and Trichuris for experiment I, and of Strongylida and Trichuris for experiment II. After the random draw, eight animals were treated, orally, during seven consecutive days with 100 µg/kg/day ivermectin (Ivermectina® premix, Ouro Fino Agronegócios), eight other animals were treated, orally, during seven consecutive days with 100 µg/kg/day abamectin (Virbamax® premix – Virbac do Brasil Indústria e Comércio Ltda.), and eight pigs were kept as controls. EPG counts were performed for each individual animal at 14th day post-treatment (DPT). All animals (control and treatment) were necropsied at the 14th DPT. The results from both experiments demonstrate that both ivermectin and abamectin, administered orally for a continuous period of seven days, at a daily dosage of 100 µg/kg, were highly effective (>95%) against Hyostrongylus rubidus, Strongyloides ransomi, Ascaris suum and Metastrongylus salmi. Against Oesophagostomum dentatum, abamectin presented over 95% efficacy against both evaluated strains, while ivermectin reached other strain as resistant. Regarding T. suis, both ivermectin and abamectin were effective (efficacies >90%) against one of the tested strains, while the other one was classified as resistant. Furthermore, the EPG values were equivalent with the ivermectin and abamectin efficacy obtained by parasitological necropsies.
ISSN:0034-5288
1532-2661
DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.09.007