Comparison of Mailed vs. On-site Emergency Department Patient Satisfaction Surveys
Abstract Background Patient satisfaction is one measure of the quality of emergency department (ED) care. The impact of survey delivery method on patient satisfaction in the ED remains unknown. Objective We hypothesized that self-administered surveys in the ED would yield a higher response rate and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of emergency medicine 2014-12, Vol.47 (6), p.702-709 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background Patient satisfaction is one measure of the quality of emergency department (ED) care. The impact of survey delivery method on patient satisfaction in the ED remains unknown. Objective We hypothesized that self-administered surveys in the ED would yield a higher response rate and different satisfaction compared to mailed surveys. Methods This observational study was conducted during a 2-month period in an urban, tertiary-care, university-based ED. Eligible patients were randomized to either complete an on-site satisfaction survey in the ED at discharge or to complete an identical survey mailed 1 week after discharge. The primary outcome was the reported overall satisfaction of on-site vs. mail-out surveys. Satisfaction was measured using Likert-type scales and dichotomized outcomes were compared using a χ2 test and logistic regression. Results Two hundred and forty-two of 457 eligible patients randomized to the on-site group and 275 of 1152 patients in the mail-out group completed a survey (53% vs. 24%; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0736-4679 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.057 |