Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations

•We examine how physical space shapes the formation and success of collaborations.•We model spatial effects on collaboration with a new proximity metric, path overlap.•Greater path overlap increases researchers’ propensity to collaborate.•Overlapping paths increase the likelihood new collaborative g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research policy 2014-11, Vol.43 (9), p.1469-1485
Hauptverfasser: Kabo, Felichism W., Cotton-Nessler, Natalie, Hwang, Yongha, Levenstein, Margaret C., Owen-Smith, Jason
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We examine how physical space shapes the formation and success of collaborations.•We model spatial effects on collaboration with a new proximity metric, path overlap.•Greater path overlap increases researchers’ propensity to collaborate.•Overlapping paths increase the likelihood new collaborative grants will be funded.•These observed effects of path overlap hold across two different building layouts. This paper uses path overlap, an innovative measure of functional proximity, to examine how physical space shaped the formation and success of scientific collaborations among the occupants of two academic research buildings. We use research administration data on human subject protection, animal use management, and grant funding applications to construct new measures of collaboration formation and success. The “functional zones” investigators occupy in their buildings are defined by the shortest walking paths among assigned laboratory and office spaces, and the nearest elevators, stairs, and restrooms. When two investigators traverse paths with greater overlap, both their propensity to form new collaborations and to win grant funding for their joint work increase. This effect is robust across two very differently configured buildings. Implications for scientific collaboration and the design and allocation of research space are considered.
ISSN:0048-7333
1873-7625
DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.007