Critiquing US Health Care
Critics of US health care usually begin by noting that this country spends a much greater share of its gross domestic product on health care than any other country but lags in life expectancy at birth. This critique implicitly (and sometimes explicitly) assumes that there should be a positive correl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2014-11, Vol.312 (20), p.2095-2096 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Critics of US health care usually begin by noting that this country spends a much greater share of its gross domestic product on health care than any other country but lags in life expectancy at birth. This critique implicitly (and sometimes explicitly) assumes that there should be a positive correlation between health care expenditures and life expectancy. Such an assumption is fully justified for low-income countries with minimal health care; additional care and financial resources usually have substantial favorable effects on life expectancy. Here, Fuchs examines several criticisms about the US health care. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.2014.14114 |