Study “guesstimated” how many cancers would have occurred without mammography screening

De Glas and colleagues' conclusions are incorrect, having adopted the faulty method used by Bleyer and Welch. 1 2 All authors incorrectly claimed massive overdiagnosis of breast cancer and failure to reduce the rate of advanced cancers. 3 4 Both papers rely on "guesstimating" how many...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ (Online) 2014-11, Vol.349 (nov25 12), p.g6824-g6824
1. Verfasser: Kopans, Daniel B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:De Glas and colleagues' conclusions are incorrect, having adopted the faulty method used by Bleyer and Welch. 1 2 All authors incorrectly claimed massive overdiagnosis of breast cancer and failure to reduce the rate of advanced cancers. 3 4 Both papers rely on "guesstimating" how many cancers would have occurred without screening and falsely claim that the excess beyond their guesses would have never occurred.
ISSN:0959-8138
1756-1833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.g6824