Assessment of Luminescent Downshifting Layers for the Improvement of Light-Harvesting Efficiency in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Luminescence downshifting (LDS) of light can be a practical photon management technique to compensate the narrow absorption band of high‐extinction‐coefficient dyes in dye‐sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Herein, an optical analysis on the loss mechanisms in a reflective LDS (R‐LDS)/DSSC configuratio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemphyschem 2014-12, Vol.15 (17), p.3791-3799
Hauptverfasser: Hosseini, Zahra, Diau, Eric Wei-Guang, Mehrany, Khashayar, Taghavinia, Nima
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Luminescence downshifting (LDS) of light can be a practical photon management technique to compensate the narrow absorption band of high‐extinction‐coefficient dyes in dye‐sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Herein, an optical analysis on the loss mechanisms in a reflective LDS (R‐LDS)/DSSC configuration is reported. For squaraine dye (550–700 nm absorption band) and CaAlSiN3:Eu2+ LDS material (550–700 nm emission band), the major loss channels are found to be non‐unity luminescence quantum efficiency (QE) and electrolyte absorption. By using an ideal LDS layer (QE=100 %), a less absorbing electrolyte (Co‐based), and antireflection coatings, approximately 20 % better light harvesting is obtained. If the absorption/emission band of dye/LDS is shifted to 800 nm, a maximal short‐circuit current density (Jsc) of 22.1 mA cm−2 can be achieved. By putting the LDS layer in front of the DSSC (transmissive mode), more significant loss channels are observed, and hence a lower overall efficiency than the R‐LDS configuration. On reflection: Luminescent downshifting is a photon management technique that can be used in transmissive (front of the cell) or reflective configurations (back of the cell; see picture, QE=quantum efficiency). Optical loss analysis of the two configurations proves the reflective configuration to be more effective.
ISSN:1439-4235
1439-7641
DOI:10.1002/cphc.201402505