A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Itraconazole Oral Solution and Fluconazole Tablets in the Treatment of Esophageal Candidiasis

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole tablets in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. One hundred twenty-six immunocompromised patients with esophageal candidiasis were treated with itraconazole oral soluti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of infectious diseases 1997-07, Vol.176 (1), p.227-232
Hauptverfasser: Wilcox, C. Mel, Darouiche, Rabih O., Laine, Loren, Moskovitz, Bruce L., Mallegol, Irma, Wu, Jane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole tablets in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. One hundred twenty-six immunocompromised patients with esophageal candidiasis were treated with itraconazole oral solution or fluconazole tablets (both at 100–200 mg) once daily for 3–8 weeks, for 2 weeks beyond the resolution of symptoms, and were then followed for 4 more weeks. Severity of symptoms was assessed weekly during treatment and every 2 weeks during follow-up. Patients treated with itraconazole oral solution had a rate of clinical response (cured or improved) comparable to that of patients treated with fluconazole (94% vs. 91%). The mycologic eradication rate was 92% for itraconazole and 78% for fluconazole. Both treatments were well tolerated. Results from treatment with once-daily itraconazole oral solution was clinically comparable to those with fluconazole and is an alternative for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in immunocompromised patients.
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1086/514028