Optimization of furrow irrigation schedules, designs and net return to water
A seasonal furrow irrigation model consisting of irrigation scheduling and kinematic-wave-based hydraulic submodels was modified to incorporate an economic optimization submodel. The model used a systematic simulation technique to optimize furrow irrigation schedules and designs assuming 80% irrigat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agricultural water management 1998, Vol.35 (3), p.209-226 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A seasonal furrow irrigation model consisting of irrigation scheduling and kinematic-wave-based hydraulic submodels was modified to incorporate an economic optimization submodel. The model used a systematic simulation technique to optimize furrow irrigation schedules and designs assuming 80% irrigation adequacy at cutoff time. The irrigation schedules and designs were optimized for the homogeneous and heterogeneous infiltration under the mean and observed ET
o (grass reference crop ET) conditions. The optimal management allowable depletion (MAD) level changed with the variation in ET
o condition, and with the consideration of spatial and temporal (seasonal) variability in infiltration characteristics. Irrigation design changed with both infiltration conditions and MAD level. Infiltration variability did not influence the bean yield. However, the return to water decreased when spatial variability in infiltration conditions was considered. Using mean ET
o resulted in slightly higher yield and net return to water as compared to using observed ET
o. A small variation in daily mean ET
o values with respect to daily observed ET
o values caused a change in both irrigation schedules and designs. Therefore, mean ET
o cannot be used to forecast irrigation schedules and designs at the beginning of crop season. The net return to water increased (1.7 to 3.6%), and the seasonal inflow, losses, and bean yield decreased in the case of variable interval scheduling (holding MAD constant) as compared to the fixed interval scheduling (MAD varies). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-3774 1873-2283 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0378-3774(97)00037-1 |