Comparison of baseline free testosterone and cortisol concentrations between elite and non-elite female athletes

Objectives: To compare the baseline free testosterone (T) and cortisol (C) concentrations of elite and non‐elite female athletes. Methods: Eighteen females from different sports (track and field, netball, cycling, swimming, bob skeleton) were monitored over a 12‐week period. Baseline measures of sal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of human biology 2012-11, Vol.24 (6), p.856-858
Hauptverfasser: Cook, Christian J., Crewther, Blair T., Smith, Alan A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: To compare the baseline free testosterone (T) and cortisol (C) concentrations of elite and non‐elite female athletes. Methods: Eighteen females from different sports (track and field, netball, cycling, swimming, bob skeleton) were monitored over a 12‐week period. Baseline measures of salivary free T and C concentrations were taken weekly prior to any training. The elites (n = 9) and non‐elites (n = 9) were classified as international and national level competitors, respectively, with both groups matched by sport. Results: The pooled free T concentrations of the elites (87 pg/ml) were significantly higher than the non‐elites (41 pg/ml) and consistently so across all weekly time points (P < 0.001). Pooled free C concentrations were also greater in the elite group (2.90 ng/ml) than the non‐elites (2.32 ng/ml) (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The pooled baseline T and C measures were higher in elite female athletes than non‐elites. Higher free T and C concentrations could indicate a greater capacity for physical performance at higher work rates, which is commensurate with the demands of elite sport. Speculatively, the T differences observed could influence female behavior and thereby help to regulate sporting potential. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN:1042-0533
1520-6300
DOI:10.1002/ajhb.22302