Effects of selective D sub(1) and D sub(2) dopamine antagonists on the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine

The objective of the present study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine could be blocked by either D sub(1) or D sub(2) selective dopamine antagonists. In three experiments, male rats received 10-21 daily injections of a selective D sub(1) (SCH 23390; 0...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychopharmacology 1991-01, Vol.105 (4), p.501-507
Hauptverfasser: Mattingly, BA, Rowlett, J K, Graff, J T, Hatton, BJo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The objective of the present study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine could be blocked by either D sub(1) or D sub(2) selective dopamine antagonists. In three experiments, male rats received 10-21 daily injections of a selective D sub(1) (SCH 23390; 0 or 0.5 mg/kg IP) or D sub(2) (sulpiride; 0, 30, or 100 mg/kg IP) antagonist followed by an apomorphine (0 or 1.0 mg/kg SC) injection. In two experiments, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas after the daily injections. In all experiments, the rats were tested for sensitization to apomorphine following the training phase. The results indicated that apomorphine produced a progressively greater increase in locomotor activity with each injection, and this apomorphine-induced increase in activity was completely blocked by both sulpiride and SCH 23390 treatments. However, although both sulpiride and SCH 23390 blocked apomorphine-induced activity, only SCH 23390 injections prevented the development of sensitization to apomorphine.
ISSN:0033-3158