Information theoretic ranking of four models of diffusion attenuation in fresh and fixed prostate tissue ex vivo

Purpose To compare the theoretical information content of four popular models of diffusion‐weighted signal attenuation. Method Four whole prostates were imaged fresh unfixed and fixed at 9.4T. Biexponential, kurtosis, stretched exponential, and monoexponential models were ranked using Akaike's...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2014-11, Vol.72 (5), p.1418-1426
Hauptverfasser: Bourne, Roger M., Panagiotaki, Eleftheria, Bongers, Andre, Sved, Paul, Watson, Geoffrey, Alexander, Daniel C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To compare the theoretical information content of four popular models of diffusion‐weighted signal attenuation. Method Four whole prostates were imaged fresh unfixed and fixed at 9.4T. Biexponential, kurtosis, stretched exponential, and monoexponential models were ranked using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) with validation by a leave‐one‐out test of model prediction error. Results For unfixed tissue measurements (b‐value range: 17–2104 s/mm2) the biexponential and kurtosis models had similar information content to each other and this was distinctly higher than for the stretched and monoexponential models. In fixed‐tissue measurements (b‐value range: 17–8252 s/mm2), the biexponential model had much higher information content than the three other models. Conclusion AIC‐based model ranking is consistent with an independent prediction accuracy test. Biexponential and kurtosis models consistently perform better than stretched and monoexponential models. The biexponential model has increasing superiority over all three other models as maximum b‐value increases above ∼2000 s/mm2. Magn Reson Med 72:1418–1426, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.25032